Goose
Ringing Project
Every year since 1982 the Dartford Ringing Group has carried out a roundup
of the geese at the Sevenoaks Wildlife Reserve (previously the Jeffery
Harrison Reserve). This involves a large number of ringers, canoeists
and other helpers and takes place during the period when the geese are
flightless in mid June.
The tables below
show the number of new birds and retraps processed, together with a
retrap history showing the original ringing year of birds retrapped
in 2007. This year’s total of 205 birds included 3 Mute
Swan and a single Coot.
2007 |
|
2006 |
Greylag Goose |
Adults |
Juveniles |
Totals |
Totals |
New birds |
57 |
12 |
69 |
113 |
Retraps |
67 |
|
67 |
100 |
Totals |
124 |
12 |
136 |
213 |
|
Canada
Goose |
|
New birds |
33 |
7 |
40 |
|
67 |
Retraps |
25 |
0 |
25 |
64 |
Totals |
58 |
7 |
65 |
131 |
Retrap history
| Year of ringing |
93 |
94 |
95 |
96 |
97 |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
Total |
Greylag Goose |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
16 |
35 |
67 |
Canada Goose |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
1 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
4 |
25 |
Some interesting observations on the long-term catch data
The group has a long running data series from the annual goose roundups and over
the years we have published several short papers on various aspects of our
study; the most important of which was Ron Terry's paper published in the 1997
group report. This looked in detail at the monthly and annual sight counts
of Greylag Geese from 1961 to 1997 and the annual ringing totals from 1982
to 1997. Two of the most interesting extracts from the data were the number
of first year birds in the annual catch and the relationship between birds
that had not previously been caught and ringed and those already wearing a
ring. As several years have passed since Ron's paper it seemed that a short
update on some aspects of the study would be useful, pending a more detailed
paper in the near future.
Retraps
The table below shows the year of ringing for all retraps from 1986 to
2007 and raises some interesting questions; why do the number of birds
retrapped from the previous year fluctuate so much and why do some
birds appear in the retrap data each year whilst others are absent
for many years after their original ringing date, only to reappear
for several years in a row before finally disappearing altogether;
there is obviously a lot of scope for further study here. In 2007 a
new longevity record was set by 5167153, originally ringed on 20th
June 1993 some 14 years and 7 days before this years retrap date of
24th June. This bird has only been retrapped twice in the intervening
years, in 2003 and 2005.
| Year ringed |
84 |
85 |
86 |
87 |
88 |
89 |
90 |
91 |
92 |
93 |
94 |
95 |
96 |
97 |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
07 |
| 1982 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1984 |
|
1 |
|
5 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1985 |
|
|
1 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1986 |
|
|
|
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1987 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
9 |
16 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1988 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
| 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
7 |
10 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
15 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
| 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
9 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
| 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
4 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
| 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
12 |
12 |
2 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
| 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
| 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
13 |
1 |
11 |
10 |
1 |
| 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
| 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
13 |
8 |
5 |
| 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
| 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
16 |
| 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
As can be seen from Table 1 the number of retraps caught each year fluctuates
but of course so does the total catch. Figure 1 below plots the number
of retraps as a percentage of the total catch for each year's roundup.
As one would expect the early years show a gradual increase in the ratio
as more ringed birds are added to the population. However, once we get
to 1993 the ratio begins to fluctuate considerably, with a peak of three
retraps to each new bird in 1994 and a low of one to one in 1997. This
was followed by a further three years at almost the same ratio before
rising again in 2001 and 2002. In 2004 the catch was very small and therefore
the number of retraps from that year in the population as a whole was
much reduced and therefore there were more un-ringed birds available
to be caught in 2005. There was a return to the long-term average in
2006, which is beginning to flatten out at about 1.75%, or five retraps
for every three new birds in the catch, but then a slight falling away
from this in 2007.
Figure 1

Percentage of juvenile birds in the annual catch
Another interesting extract from the data is the number of juveniles
in each year’s catch. As can be seen from Figure 2 below there have been large
fluctuations in the percentage of juveniles and although in the early years of
the study, the timing of the roundup and the capture methods meant that there
were either a large number of juveniles or virtually none at all. However, since
the late 1980’s the date of the roundup and the capture method has been
relatively consistent. It may be that this graph does, to some extent, reflect
the productivity of the Greylags at Sevenoaks
Figure 2

Contributions to other research projects
During the 2007 roundup, feather samples were collected under
licence for Steffen Hahn of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology. The
main objectives of his study are to show how parental habitat choice
is reflected in diet for goslings at an individual or family level,
and also how habitat use by Greylag families differs on a European
scale. Samples are being taken in The Netherlands, Germany, Sweden,
Norway, Estonia and the Czech Republic, with Sevenoaks being the main
UK representative site.

And finally,
a big thank-you to all the visiting ringers, canoeists and helpers, who
all contributed to the success of the 2007 roundup.
|